A report from GHTC and Policy Cures Research examines how US federal funding for global health R&D is delivering impact both abroad and at home.

Search the GHTC website

Global health and medical research saved from spending cuts in FY17 budget agreement

Read time:
Architect of the Capitol

What global health R&D advocates need to know about the FY2017 budget agreement.

May 2, 2017 by Courtney Carson

On Monday, Congress struck a deal finalizing government spending legislation for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2017. Since October 1, 2016, the government has been operating on a series of continuing resolutions (CR)—maintaining government spending at FY16 levels until a full deal for FY17 could be negotiated. With the omnibus legislation in place, we expect both houses of Congress to pass the final FY17 bill this week. 

There was strong bipartisan, bicameral support for advancing FY17 omnibus legislation that reflected priorities, compromises, and negotiations reached during the regular FY17 appropriations process. This means that strong congressional support for protecting medical research and global health in individual FY17 appropriations bills was carried through in the final legislation. While we know there will be more challenges in the FY18 budget and appropriations process, the FY17 omnibus was an encouraging sign that Congress understands the vital role of US global health and medical research programs.

US Agency for International Development and State Department

While the Trump Administration proposed rescissions for the US Agency for International Development’s (USAID) global health funding for FY17—including cuts to the President’s Emergency Plans for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), polio, tuberculosis (TB), neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), and eliminating global health security funding—in the final FY17 omnibus, global health programs at USAID saw an 8 percent boost in funding, totaling just over US$3 billion versus $2.83 billion in FY16. Notable increases included $5 million for TB, $81 million for malaria, $40 million for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and $70 million for global health security to create a new Emergency Reserve Fund to respond rapidly to emerging health threats. Other global health accounts within USAID and the State Department received level funding.

USAID continues to play a leading role in the US government’s action on global health research and development (R&D), and it is critical that global health programs receive appropriate funding so that investments in R&D will continue to be prioritized among other activities. The combination of increased funding for some key programs and level funding for others in FY17 is a positive sign that Congress shares our priorities and will work to protect these accounts in more challenging budget and appropriations conversations for FY18.

National Institutes of Health

Strong bipartisan support for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) continued in the FY17 bill. Overall, NIH received a $2 billion increase, raising total funding for FY17 to $34 billion. However, it’s important to note that little of this increase will likely support global health programming. Much of this increase was to fund enactment of the 21st Century Cures Act, but notable increases that could benefit global health R&D included a 6 percent or $277 million increase for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a $1.76 million increase for the Fogarty International Center, and additional funding for the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

While NIH has long enjoyed bipartisan support—and thus it is not surprising to see a funding boost in FY17—it was notable that the Trump Administration proposed over $1.2 billion in rescissions for NIH for FY17 and a 19 percent cut to NIH funding for FY18, including eliminating the Fogarty International Center. NIH leads the world in global health R&D, and its work in basic research is vital to advancing new drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, and other tools for neglected diseases and conditions. It is encouraging to see Congress maintain and increase NIH funding overall and prioritize US leadership in medical research for FY17; however, greater support is needed for NIH programs that advance research for neglected diseases and conditions

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

A laboratory worker wearing a surgical mask works with samples. (Photo: PATH/Mike Wang) A laboratory worker wearing a surgical mask works with samples. (Photo: PATH/Mike Wang) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) funding for global health was also protected in the final FY17 omnibus. Overall, the CDC Center for Global Health saw an $8 million increase from FY16 funding levels, including targeted increases for global public health protection and global disease protection activities.Funding for polio and measles was increased, while parasitic diseases, malaria, and global HIV and AIDS funding remained level. In addition, the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases received a $5 million increase.

CDC plays an important role in detecting, preventing, and responding to infectious disease threats at home and around the world. This work is critical to developing new prevention and diagnosis technologies, particularly those to address endemic and emerging global health threats. Robust funding for CDC’s global health programs is vital to advancing global health R&D and promoting global health security.

Department of Defense

The Department of Defense’s (DoD) work in infectious disease R&D was also strengthened in the final FY17 omnibus. DoD’s Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program—which conducts research on antimicrobial resistance, diarrheal diseases, emerging infectious diseases, malaria, TB, and vaccine development for infectious diseases—received $300 million in funding. In addition, the bill included strong report language supporting DoD’s critical work in global health R&D and supporting continued and robust investments.

The final FY17 spending bill is encouraging news for global health R&D as it protected funding for critical global health and medical research accounts across USAID, NIH, CDC, and DoD. However, this victory may be only temporary, as we know that many of these same accounts will face intense pressures in FY18 budget negotiations, given aggressive action by the Trump Administration to downsize activities and reduce government spending. GHTC will continue to champion strong US leadership in global health R&D and stress the impacts of these important programs in protecting health at home and around the world.


 

Categories: CDC, DoD, FDA, HHS, NIH, State Department, US budget

About the author

Courtney CarsonGHTC

Courtney Carson is a policy and advocacy officer at GHTC, who leads GHTC's US advocacy portfolio.

Other Breakthroughs Blog posts you may like:
PATH/Claire Suni
May 7, 2017

Research Roundup: Barriers to TB immunization, malaria's genetic diversity, and IPM's dapivirine ring

Written by Taylor Capizola / GHTC
Read time:
In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. For many years, ineffective treatment plans and archaic diagnostic tools have stood as a barrier to tackling tuberculosis (TB). More recently, new drugs and diagnostics have emerged. Yet, availability has not always translated to widespread access. For example, despite the availability of new rapid diagnostic tools like GeneXpert, it is estimated that over 40 percent of new TB cases go undiagnosed or are not reported and use of older, less accurate sputum tests still outpace use of the GeneXpert. Though new drugs like bedaquiline and delamanid are not available, more than 75 of patients who need them do not have adequate access. A number of hurdles to adoption and scale-up exist from lack of funding for TB programs to high costs to implementation failures Action is needed by global leaders and innovators to break down these barriers if the global community wants to achieve its goal of eradicating TB by 2030. Malaria is more complex than scientists previously thought. In a recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists used DNA fingerprinting to track malaria on a cellular level. They found that the parasite has a heightened level of genetic recombination developed during meiosis, leading to a wide variety of malaria strains. This suggests that malaria can evade immune system response, acting as a chronic disease—and it means there is no one-cure-fits-all solution. Because of the incredible amount of genetic diversity malaria can have in the body, one vaccine solution may not work for all individuals, casting doubt on the efficay of vaccines now in development. While this discovery makes malaria harder to prevent and eradicate, scientists have also discovered that malaria isn’t as transmissible as it first seemed, with the parasite only causing five or six secondary cases from one original infection, whereas it was previously thought one case could subsequently infect dozens of individuals. The International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM) has announced a clinical trial that is hopeful to significantly reduce cases of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa and around the world. The clinical trial will use the IPM-developed dapivirine ring, a small silicone ring inserted in the vagina, releasing a contraceptive (levonorgestrel) and an anti-HIV drug (dapivirine). The ring is easy to insert and lasts three months. Building on the previous ring that only released dapivirine, having the ring also act as a contraceptive will not only reduce the likelihood of HIV infecting women, but will also provide women with the choice to protect against unwanted pregnancy. This trial is especially important because women are most at-risk for contracting HIV, especially in countries with low rates of condom use. IPM hopes to have the ring ready for shipment globally by 2020.    
PATH/Aaron Joel Santos
April 30, 2017

Research Roundup: Breaking down Zika and opportunities, challenges surrounding global immunization

Written by Taylor Capizola / GHTC
Read time:
In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. Researchers in Brazil have discovered the structure of the protein responsible for replicating the Zika virus thousands of times in cells, causing the virus to break through the cell wall and infect the body. Through many months of collecting data and studying the origins of the virus, the researchers put together a three-dimensional model of the protein and published their findings in Nature Communications. Zika is a flavivirus and in the same genus as diseases like yellow fever, dengue, and hepatitis C. Because of the genetic similarity, researchers and scientists have found that sofosbovir, a commonly used drug to treat hepatitis C, is a good therapeutic option for those suffering from Zika. The unlocking of Zika’s genetic code will lead to the development of new solutions to the virus. It recently became global news that RTS,S (trade name Mosquirix™), the candidate malaria vaccine furthest along in development, is beginning vaccine pilot programs in three chosen countries: Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. The vaccine, created through a partnership with PATH’s Malaria Vaccine Initiative and GlaxoSmithKline, is given in four doses over a specific period of time. It is not yet known if tracking of these vaccine doses will be 100 percent. Any vaccine administered in multiple doses, whether for malaria or HPV, requires a lot more work in educating individuals about the need to return for all treatments necessary to ensure the vaccine’s success. UNICEF and members of the vaccine community will work with government authorities to ensure the supply chain delivers vaccines to children in need. If successful, the burden of malaria could decrease drastically. While this vaccine is promising to many individuals in these three countries, the search for a more perfect vaccine is high on the priority list for health researchers around the globe. In order to increase global access to immunization, successful and smooth-moving supply chains are necessary. The problem? Immunization supply chains are complex and every part of the chain needs to be working perfectly to ensure access to the vaccines. Many members of the immunization community have neglected the supply chain facet of vaccine delivery, and as a result, these supply chains have suffered and grown obsolete. With these chains being out-of-date, many children remain unvaccinated from even the most common diseases. A special issue published in Vaccine highlights these issues and brings the need for supply chain renewal to the forefront of the conversation. But even after this publication, more has to be done to ensure all members of the vaccine community work together to guarantee access to vaccines is in reach for all. Despite vaccine initiatives being stronger than ever, there is still a glaring gap in the number of children receiving basic vaccines. Currently, there are over 19 million children who are unvaccinated, leaving them susceptible to diseases that can be protected against. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control worked together to establish the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) aimed at closing the gap of vaccine inequality around the globe. GVAP has already seen many successes, including fostering a working relationship with government institutions to implement surveillance techniques to figure out what vaccines children need most in each country. Kenya and Nepal, for example, have initiatives through pediatricians to educate families about the importance of vaccines for children’s development and longevity of life. GVAP is in the forefront of bridging the gap of health inequity and bringing immunization to all.