Breakthroughs Blog: WHO

Researchers examine onchocerciasis (river blindness) diagnostic tests. PATH/Patrick McKernWithout the right diagnostics, we can’t effectively treat diseases. It’s an obvious statement. But in many low- and middle-income countries, doctors and health care workers don’t have access to the diagnostic tools they need, often because existing tests are too costly and not appropriate for low-resource settings or tests don’t exist at all. Without the right tests, doctors end up relying on patient symptoms, which can be remarkably similar across different diseases. The result can be devastating: A wrong diagnosis can lead to the wrong treatment or a failure to recognize the presence of disease with pandemic potential. This problem is a common one: in half of African countries, more than 80 percent of those treated for malaria receive medicine without confirmation of a diagnostics, and during the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak, efforts to contain the outbreak were hampered by a lack of rapid, point-of-care tests that could be deployed easily in the field.In a recent New England Journal of Medicine article, a group of scientists and doctors suggested an innovative idea to improve global access to critically-needed diagnostic tools: create a list.More specifically, they’re calling for the creation of an essential diagnostics list to complement the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines (EML). The EML provides guidance to countries on what drugs, therapies, and treatments should be made available to citizens to meet basic public health needs. Likewise, an essential diagnostics list would provide guidance on the vital diagnostics tests that should be available in each country, depending on its disease burden. In this way, the two lists would support and complement each other, with the diagnostics list identifying the tests needed to enable appropriate use of medicines on the EML.The transformative potential of an essential diagnostics listThe authors of the article have detailed the many ways an essential diagnostics list could be a transformative force for improving diagnostic capacity and access. By setting global guidance on the diagnostics tests recommended to countries to address basic health needs, an essential diagnostics list could provide a forceful policy argument for governments to invest in making existing diagnostics more broadly available. A list could also encourage governments to make further improvements to health systems to support diagnostic use, including laboratory training programs and strengthening health infrastructure and supply chains.But what GHTC is most excited about is one of the lesser-discussed aspects of an essential diagnostics list: its potential to catalyze research and development (R&D) of new diagnostic tools. A patient gets tested for malaria. PATH/Gena Morgan Diagnostic R&D is a significantly underfunded area of research, accounting for less than 5 percent of global funding of neglected disease R&D. The result is a lack of diagnostic tools targeting the specific health needs of low- and middle-income countries, such as easy-to-use platform technologies or rapid, point-of-care tests that can be used in remote, rural clinics.By detailing which diagnostics are necessary to support health interventions on the EML, an essential diagnostics list would readily expose health areas where we today lack appropriate and effective tools. In this way, the list could signal to product developers, industry, and donors where funding and attention is needed to facilitate diagnostic R&D.The impact of improved diagnostic access and capacity would be considerable: better care and treatment for patients, reduction in the inappropriate use of medicines which is contributing to drug resistance, and improved ability to detect emerging diseases like Zika and Ebola early before they become epidemics.Joining the call for an essential diagnostics listOn Wednesday, GHTC sent a letter, signed by 11 of our member organizations, to WHO’s assistant director-general for Health Systems and Innovation calling for WHO to spearhead the creation of an essential diagnostics list. Given WHO’s experience in administering the EML and its ongoing work in providing guidance on diagnostic testing and laboratory accreditation; we believe the organization is uniquely positioned to lead on the development and implementation of this list. But making this initiative a reality will require the support of civil society and member states, as well as additional funding to stand-up the program at WHO.It is clear that treatment can be improved with essential diagnostics—ones we have today and others yet to be developed. We urge WHO and its member states to heed this call to establish an essential diagnostics list. It’s a smart, cost-effective idea that could advance diagnostic R&D and access.Update: On November 18, Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny, WHO Assistant Director-General for Health Systems and Innovation, replied to GHTC's letter indicating that WHO is pursuing analysis of the idea and outlining next steps. GHTC will continue to monitor progress and engage with WHO in support of this initiative.

While overuse of antibiotics is often cited as a leading contributor to the development and spread of drug-resistant bacteria, recent studies reveal that pollution from antibiotic manufacturing plants in India and China is also playing a role. The wastewater released from these manufacturing facilities contains active antimicrobial ingredients, and in some cases, higher concentrations of these compounds are found downstream from these facilities than is found in patients currently taking antibiotics. One type of bacteria can acquire from another type of bacteria genes that confer resistance to a certain drug. Consequently, resistance is spreading rapidly in wastewater treatment plants in China—for every bacterium that goes into the plants, four to five drug-resistant bacteria come out. To combat this dangerous trend, advocates are calling on the US government, drugmakers, pharmaceutical retailers, and consumers to put pressure on these plants to stop polluting using diplomatic tactics and purchasing power. Meanwhile, new data from the European Medicines Agency indicate that while sales of antibiotics for use in livestock has declined modestly in the European Union, sales have increased for many of the world’s strongest antibiotics, including last-resort treatments and those deemed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be “critically important in human medicine.” Between 2000 and 2015, insecticides prevented nearly 500 million deaths from malaria, however, this remarkable progress could be upended as mosquitoes develop resistance to pyrethroids, the most commonly used class of insecticides. Pyrethroids have been around for nearly 40 years, and while resistance to this class first appeared in 1993, it has been growing rapidly over the past decade, which has resulted in increased transmission of the parasite in some countries. The pipeline for new insecticides is limited, particularly those that are safe for use in bednets. IVCC, a public-private partnership and member of GHTC, is catalyzing research to both develop novel insecticides and products that combine pyrethroids with other agents to combat growing resistance. The organization has partnered with several pharmaceutical companies and is screening their libraries of more than 4 million chemical compounds to identify the three most promising, which they will then test to determine not only safety and efficacy, but also whether they are long lasting (i.e., effective for at least three years and able to withstand 20 rounds of washing). Other entities have created bednets that combine pyrethroids with pyriproxyfen—which sterilizes the mosquitoes—and piperonyl butoxide—which could make resistance mosquitoes vulnerable to pyrethroids again. For the former, results from an evaluation will be released shortly, and for the latter, results of small trials have been encouraging, but larger, more rigorous trials are needed. The WHO recently convened pharmaceutical companies and humanitarian organizations with the goal of establishing a mechanism to facilitate the sale of low-cost vaccines during emergencies. Under the program, pharmaceutical companies would pledge to provide predetermined vaccines at the lowest price possible during crises such as natural disasters or wars. Currently, many of the targeted drugmakers have agreements with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, through which vaccines are purchased in high volumes at these rock-bottom prices. However, the proposed mechanism would limit sales to nonprofits, rather than governmental bodies, to ensure that the vaccines procured would only be deployed as part of a crisis response. GlaxoSmithKline has already agreed to participate, providing its vaccine against pneumonia—the leading cause of death for children under five—at a reduced price during emergencies. The WHO is working to engage additional drugmakers as it seeks to expand the mechanism to cover vaccines against 23 different diseases, including cholera, measles, yellow fever, and hepatitis.

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced the Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostic Challenge last week, a competition which will award US$20 million for the development of rapid, point-of-care diagnostics to combat antimicrobial resistance. The competition will be funded by NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, while the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration will provide scientific and regulatory expertise. Eligible diagnostics are those that either test for drug-resistant bacteria or differentiate between viral and bacterial infections, critical tools to reduce ineffective and unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. The recently launched Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) will fund early stage human clinical trials and stockpile vaccine candidates for the viruses most likely to cause the next major epidemic. CEPI will collaborate with product developers and the World Health Organization (WHO) to facilitate regulatory review of vaccine candidates and to ensure that large scale clinical trials can be rapidly rolled out in the case of an outbreak. Eligible vaccine candidates will target viruses identified by the WHO as the greatest threats, including Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever, Ebola and Marburg, Lassa fever, Rift Valley fever, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and Nipah virus. The coalition was formed by the governments of India and Norway, philanthropic organizations the Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Economic Forum and will be housed at the Norwegian Institute for Public Health in Oslo. The International Vaccine Institute (IVI) is partnering with Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd. (Innovax) to expand access to the world’s first and only vaccine against Hepatitis E—a viral disease that causes 20 million infections and results in 70,000 deaths and 3,000 stillbirths each year. The vaccine, Hecolin®, was developed by Innovax and is only licensed for use in China. The Gates Foundation will support an assessment of the vaccine to determine its eligibility for WHO prequalification—a process that evaluates the safety, efficacy, and quality of a specific health tool produced by a specific manufacturer and that enables the product to be purchased by United Nations agencies. Hecolin® offered complete protection against hepatitis E in a phase 3 clinical trial with more than 100,000 participants. Pharmaceutical company Takeda has initiated a phase 3 clinical trial of its vaccine candidate against dengue fever, a mosquito-borne infection caused by four closely related viruses. Last year, pharmaceutical company Sanofi launched the world’s first dengue vaccine, however, new research suggests that the vaccine could actually increase the severity of infections in children who have never been exposed to dengue. This is due to antibody-dependent enhancement, in which protective antibodies against a virus (in this case, one strain of dengue virus) can actually help related viruses (the other three strains of dengue virus) attack human cells. Consequently, the antibodies produced by children receiving the vaccine could actually exacerbate the symptoms of future infections. In phase 1 and 2 trials, Takeda’s vaccine candidate appeared to be safe and resulted in the production of antibodies against all four strains of the virus. For its phase 3 trial, Takeda plans to enroll 20,000 children in dengue-endemic nations in Latin America and Asia. The trial will evaluate safety and efficacy against all four strains of dengue and in children with and without prior exposure to the virus.

The Toxoplasma gondii parasite is infamous for consuming brain tissue, causing brain cancer, and even altering the behavior of infected individuals. However, new research suggests that it could be modified and used to treat ovarian cancer. The team of scientists at Dartmouth University created a weakened version of T. gondii, removing the genes that enable the parasite to take over its host’s cells. Next, mice with aggressive ovarian cancer were inoculated with the weakened parasite. The study demonstrated that the presence of T. gondii, along with certain proteins excreted by the parasite, resulted in an enhanced immune response to ovarian cancer tumors. While none of the mice were completely cured—which could in part be attributable to the late stage of cancer at the time of treatment—those treated with the weakened parasite survived an additional 40 days on average. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued new treatment guidelines for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, as the three sexually transmitted infections (STIs) grow increasingly resistant to antibiotics. While resistant strains of chlamydia and syphilis are rare, multidrug-resistant gonorrhea has emerged in at least ten countries, and resistance to six classes of antibiotics has been reported. The WHO is calling for enhanced surveillance of drug-resistant strains of gonorrhea, and recommends that national treatment guidelines be determined based on local patterns of resistance. While syphilis is curable with a single dose of benzathine penicillin, the supply of the drug is low, and stock outs have been reported in a number of countries. While early stages of these three STIs are often asymptomatic, they can cause significant long-term damage, including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Furthermore, they can be transmitted from mother-to-child during pregnancy and childbirth, and can increase the risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, and newborn death. As bacteria grow resistant to antibiotics, so too do fungi to antifungals. Each year, fungal infections result in 1 million deaths, and strains of both the aspergillus and candida fungi are growing resistant to the azole class of antifungals. While there are more than 20 classes of antibiotics, there are only four classes of antifungals, and thus, resistance to just one class of medicines is a major cause for concern. Scientists believe the leading cause of fungal resistance is the widespread use of fungicides on crops and in certain household paints and coatings. While dissecting mosquitoes in Guaico, Trinidad, researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases discovered a new and bewildering virus, configured unlike any other virus known to infect animals. Most viruses are comprised of a handful of genes packaged into one particle, however, the five genes of Guaico Culex exist as independent particles, and can only infect a mosquito if at least four of the five are present. Previously, viruses with this structure—known as multicomponent genomes—had only been found in plants and fungi. While humans are not susceptible to Guiaco Culex, a related virus has been found in monkeys, indicating that another multicomponent virus could infect humans.