Breakthroughs Blog: Medicines

The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) prequalification (PQ) program plays a critical role in certifying the quality, safety, and efficacy of medical products to expand access to health technologies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In our PQ Pulse interview series, GHTC speaks with stakeholders involved in the PQ process about persistent challenges within this evolving regulatory ecosystem and potential reforms to promote equitable access to innovative medical products.  Our first guest is Pierre Hugo, Vice President of Market Dynamics and Global Supply Security at the Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), a nonprofit product development partnership working to advance accessible medicines to treat, prevent, and eliminate malaria. MMV works end-to-end along the research and development pipeline, developing novel products, engaging with regional regulatory bodies, and supporting local manufacturers.In our interview, which has been lightly edited and condensed below, Pierre discusses MMV’s experience navigating WHO PQ and his hopes for the future of the R&D ecosystem.Can you tell us about MMV and the unique role and perspective it brings to product development?We fill the gap and, by and large, are a risk mitigation tool as one of the product development partnerships, or PDPs, within the malaria space to discover, develop, and deliver malaria products. Regarding access, our key ethos is that no drug is a medicine until it's in the hands of the patient. It's all very good and well developing drugs, but if they aren't developed correctly or affordably for the target population and ultimately made available, it's a dead-end game. So, we try to ensure that in the last mile, or the death-mile, drugs are getting to the patients. WHO PQ and organizations like MMV play a very important role.Broadly speaking, how would you describe MMV's experience with engaging in the WHO PQ process?  We’ve got a number of products that are now WHO prequalified, working with our pharmaceutical partners. We see the whole PQ process as a critical mechanism to ensure that quality standards are adhered to and, ultimately, to make quality-assured products available in LMICs, where maybe those regulatory pathways are a little bit less mature. I think what's great to see is that the landscape is changing, with a lot more countries achieving WHO maturity-level 3 status [Editor note: a WHO designation for countries with stable, well-functioning regulatory systems]. Yes, there have been challenges. WHO has been very collaborative, the team has been engaging, and we are grateful for the support that WHO PQ provides.Looking forward, it's going to be critical to see how WHO PQ needs to evolve and change to further strengthen and work more closely with countries’ regulatory mechanisms or pathways.How do you see the regulatory landscape evolving in the coming years, including the potential role of the African Medicines Agency (AMA) and other regional bodies?  The AMA I think is the future; it's critical that it is a success. There's a fair amount of, I wouldn't say pessimism but [questions about] how long it will take for them to be up and running, simply because they just have so many different countries and regional regulatory systems.By and large, the East African collaborative registration or collaborative processes [The Eastern African collaborative registration process is a regional initiative that aims to facilitate the registration of medicines and medical products through a collaborative process, including joint assessments and mutual recognition of regulatory decisions] have been working to some success. There are other regional harmonization networks, but it takes time, and there is still a lot of work that is needed.How do you view recent reforms made to the PQ program? Overall, we are encouraged to see efforts that enable the fast-tracking of innovative product introduction. The new WHO framework for novel products [a reform implemented in 2024 to initiate parallel, rather than sequential, processes for recommending the use of novel products and evaluating them through PQ] is just entering its pilot phase. The new web portal [an online PQ application platform that will provide real-time information for applicants, regulators, and other stakeholders on the status of products in review] will give us greater transparency. The Coordinated Scientific Advice [a new procedure that allows product developers to engage with WHO early on to better understand the evidence that they will need to generate to support PQ review and generation of policy recommendations] should ensure that later review of the finished product is as streamlined as possible.There also needs to be some thought on how AMA will work with the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, and WHO PQ to avoid complexity for local manufacturers.  If you had a hypothetical magic wand to wave to influence the program, what changes would you make?Something that is critical is to have clarity on timelines and the interaction between PQ and national regulatory bodies and lessons learned. Ultimately, what is the incentive for a manufacturer to go that extra mile to ensure that a product is quality approved [through PQ]? That's where the funders play a critical role in endorsing and supporting the process. Without that support, if you speak to a lot of the manufacturers, they say, “Well, there's no way I'll be going through the WHO PQ process. It's a major investment, and it's an additional long-term commitment that you need to make as a manufacturer.” So, ensuring that there is coordination between normative bodies, funders, procurement partners, and regulators is critical to ensure fast uptake of innovative products.The dream is to have a lot more quality-approved manufacturers in Africa, where over 95 percent of the patient population is. If you look at our new products coming down the line, like single-dose cures or long-acting injectables, greater upfront alignment is key, between WHO PQ and these stringent regulatory authorities, to offer clearer guidance in terms of what those regulatory expectations are for new products. We need to ensure that global procurement agencies, like the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the President’s Malaria Initiative, or UNICEF, are working as closely as possible with AMA and with WHO PQ to ensure the rapid uptake of new qualified drugs.I would love to see harmonization between PQ and national regulatory authorities to fast-track important innovation and ensure that new quality-assured drugs get to market faster.Putting on your advocacy hat, where do we, as an advocacy community, need to put our energy in the next couple of years to make some of those improvements become reality?  To unleash the potential [of PQ], we need to simplify the processes for manufacturers, ensure procurement commitments for a clear return on investment, and provide continuous and sustained funding to support manufacturers to embark on the lengthy quality assurance process. If I look at the manufacturers, we did an extensive exercise with the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention to identify manufacturers throughout the whole continent that would want to take malaria products forward to be WHO PQ’d. We only had about 50 manufacturers that were interested in taking part in this initiative [out of 400], so that's a very low number. I mean, we're talking small molecules, not vaccines, and you've got to ask yourself why? They obviously don't see a need to have products WHO PQ’d, which is, on the one hand, a problem. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and MMV and other partners believe that the African manufacturing sector can take its place long term alongside manufacturers from India and China, who today supply the vast majority of public health medicines for malaria on the continent.Big Pharma, if anything, is disinvesting in Africa. So, having those in-Africa partners is critical within the malaria space and, obviously, not just for malaria, but for HIV and tuberculosis and so forth.So, I'm just thinking that if manufacturers are going down the WHO PQ route, it might be a really nice carrot to say, “Look, if you are applying for the WHO PQ process, this is a financial incentive in place.” That could be a really nice carrot to keep the Big Pharma guys in the game.

In 2023, tuberculosis (TB) retook the spot as the world’s leading infectious disease killer from COVID-19, claiming the lives of around 1.25 million people that year. Insufficient and inadequate tools and treatments and growing drug resistance have challenged global efforts to bring the TB epidemic to an end. In 2023, approximately 8.2 million people were newly diagnosed with TB, the highest number recorded since the World Health Organization (WHO) began global TB monitoring in 1995. At the same time, global funding for TB diagnostic, treatment, and prevention services fell in 2023 and globally, TB research remains greatly underfunded, with only 24 percent of the $5 billion annual target reached in 2023. Scientists hope that the tide can be turned as new technologies and innovations advance to market—but to achieve that, more investment is urgently needed to boost resources and reverse setbacks. In recognition of World TB Day, test your knowledge of innovations to end TB with GHTC’s quiz: 

There is a well-known Chinese proverb that says, “Women hold up half the sky,” but when it comes to global health, sadly, humanity has a lot of ground to make up to close the stark gap between the health outcomes of women and men.While women tend to live longer than men, this longevity often comes with a greater burden of disease and disability, underscoring the urgency of addressing sex-based disparities in health care. Women, on average, spend 25 percent more of their lives in poor health compared to men, they are 52 percent more likely than men to have an adverse drug reaction and 29 percent more likely to die from one, and they’ve been found in one multi-decade study to be diagnosed later than men for more than 700 diseases. Research and development (R&D) for female-specific conditions also remains vastly underfunded: only 1 percent of R&D funding focuses on non-cancer-related women’s health.Yet despite these sobering statistics and new threats to the future of women’s health care and research funding, GHTC remains optimistic. With sustained support and investment, the scientific landscape holds immense potential to drive breakthroughs that can close these gaps and improve health outcomes for women worldwide.Thus, in recognition of International Women’s Day, GHTC is spotlighting five promising technologies in the research pipeline that could improve women’s health globally.1. A new treatment for gonorrheaGonorrhea is a sexually transmitted infection, more prevalent among women than men, that can cause serious health issues—from pelvic inflammatory disease to infertility and ectopic pregnancies—if left untreated. Combating gonorrhea has become more complicated in recent years, as growing drug resistance has reduced the arsenal of available treatment options.But, excitingly, a new, much-needed breakthrough is on the brink. A first-in-class antibiotic, zoliflodacin, developed by GHTC member the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, was found to be effective in a large-scale global Phase 3 clinical trial in 2023. If approved, it would become the first new antibiotic for treating gonorrhea in decades. The drug is also taken orally, which would simplify treatment administration for clinicians around the world, and its nonprofit developer, which is committed to delivering affordable access to the product, has the right to commercialize it in more than three-quarters of the world’s countries, including all low-income countries and most middle-income countries. Another second promising antibiotic for gonorrhea from GSK, gepotidacin, is also in late-stage development.2. A therapeutic vaccine for cervical cancerCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally, claiming the lives of 350,000 women each year. Nine out of every ten cases of cervical cancer are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.Since the introduction of the first preventative HPV vaccine nearly two decades ago, global efforts have focused on expanding immunization coverage worldwide, as well as advancing research that has reduced vaccine schedules from multiple doses to just a single dose, easing administrative costs. Yet, despite these efforts, there remain significant gaps in immunization coverage—only 27 percent of girls worldwide received an HPV vaccine dose as of 2023—underscoring the need for additional complementary treatment and prevention tools.That’s where therapeutic cervical cancer vaccines could offer promise. What if we could administer a shot to patients who have already developed precancerous lesions due to HPV that could eliminate HPV-infected calls before those cells become cancerous? This theoretical possibility could become a reality in the future. A Phase II trial of the investigational therapeutic HPV vaccine Vvax001 reported results in January, finding that the vaccine successfully induced regression of precancerous lesions in half of all trial participants. Among patients with advanced precancerous lesions, the traditional intervention is surgery to remove the affected areas, which carries the risk of side effects and complications. An effective therapeutic vaccine could reduce the number of patients who ultimately require surgery and offer advantages as an intervention that is far easier and less costly to administer in resource-limited settings worldwide.3. Inhalable oxytocin to reduce PPHPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH), or excessive bleeding after childbirth, is the leading cause of maternal deaths worldwide. While the hormone oxytocin is often administered to women following childbirth to prevent PPH by causing the uterus to contract, oxytocin products are traditionally heat-sensitive and administered via injection or intravenously, which can make this intervention challenging to administer in certain settings around the world.To solve this issue, researchers at Monash University have developed an inhalable form of oxytocin that is formulated as a dry powder requiring no refrigeration. Prior clinical research has shown that the product is comparable in effect to injected oxytocin, and now, scientists are advancing research on the best means to administer it. In late 2023, a Phase I trial assessed administration of the product using a low-cost inhaler system called the ICOone. If this product ultimately reaches the market, it could offer a much-needed alternative that would make this lifesaving drug easier to store and administer to women in need, no matter where they live.4. Biodegradable contraceptive implantsMany women worldwide choose to use contraceptive implants as their contraceptive method. These products offer unique advantages for certain women: they are long-acting and easy to use; once inserted, there is no need for users to take or do anything on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. But eventually, they must be removed when they are no longer effective or when users change their reproductive plans. This removal procedure requires trained health care providers, and it can create an access barrier for women worldwide who live far away from health care facilities.That’s why researchers are working to advance biodegradable implants, which would dissolve into the body over time, eliminating the need for removal. In February 2024, GHTC member FHI 360 launched a Phase 1 trial of a biodegradable implant, Casea S, which aims to prevent pregnancy for 18 to 24 months. At the time, it marked the first biodegradable contraceptive implant to undergo human trials in over 20 years. While the trial will still take a few years to complete and further research will be required, if the implant is successful, it could not only help solve health care access challenges but could also address a middle-ground need between existing implants that last years and long-acting injectables, which usually last three months. FHI 360 also has a second biodegradable contraceptive implant in its portfolio, which is in early-stage development and uses a different contraceptive hormone.5. A new drug to prevent preeclampsiaPreeclampsia is a dangerous pregnancy-related condition that affects between 2 and 10 percent of pregnancies worldwide and claims the lives of more than 70,000 mothers and 50,000 babies each year. While low-dose aspirin and calcium supplements are recommended to women who are at high risk of the condition, there is currently no medicine approved specifically to prevent preeclampsia. That could change in the coming years thanks to emerging research.A British biotech company has developed an investigational, once-daily oral drug, MZe786, to prevent preeclampsia, which is in early-stage development. In animal studies, the drug, which is a form of aspirin that also releases hydrogen sulfide, elicited an improvement in maternal and fetal outcomes compared to aspirin alone. While further confirmation of these effects in human clinical trials is needed and it could be many years before such a product potentially reaches market, in 2022, the drug was awarded a fast-track development status by the United Kingdom’s regulatory agency, becoming the first pregnancy-related drug to receive this status, signifying its potential to address an urgent and unmet need.All five of these promising products are inspiring examples of the stepwise progress achieved through past investments in women’s health research, but we also hope that they will serve as a rallying cry to what more could be possible if we were to devote adequate resources to addressing these challenges.This International Women’s Day, we hope that the global community will further commit to investing in innovations for women’s health and to expanding the representation of women in clinical research. After all, closing the women’s health gap is not only essential to the well-being and future of millions of women and girls worldwide, but it will also enrich the well-being and economic stability of their families, communities, and nations. It’s a responsibility and opportunity we can’t ignore.

Interested in more global health innovation news? Every week GHTC scours media reports worldwide to deliver essential global health R&D news and content to your inbox. Sign up now to receive our weekly R&D News Roundup email. A new study explores the novel use of artificial intelligence (AI) to screen for antimicrobial compound candidates that could be developed into new tuberculosis (TB) drug treatments, as the rise of drug-resistant strains of TB underscores the urgent need for new drug candidates. While discovering new TB drug candidates through traditional laboratory methods is laborious and time-consuming, sensitive machine learning is better and faster at helping interpret complicated images of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacterium, accelerating TB research capabilities and helping identify optimal candidate compounds for drug development.A COVID-19 nasal vaccine will enter a Phase 1 clinical trial conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the United States this spring. While COVID-19 cases have fallen dramatically since the height of the pandemic, the virus continues to circulate and cause severe illness and death. The nasal vaccine is designed to induce strong immunity in the nose and upper respiratory tract where the virus enters the body, aiming to not only reduce serious illness and death but also to stop transmission in the first place, which cannot be achieved through COVID-19 vaccines that are injected into the body. If proven successful, the technology could also be adopted for other common respiratory viruses, including seasonal influenza, avian flu, and respiratory syncytial virus.Uganda recently launched a trial of IAVI’s experimental vaccine targeting the Sudan virus, which causes Ebola disease, following the identification of an outbreak in the country that has, so far, killed one person and infected two others. There are no currently approved vaccines for Sudan virus, although there is a vaccine for the Zaire strain of Ebola, highlighting the urgent need to generate data about vaccine candidates in the pipeline when outbreaks arise. Ugandan health authorities and research teams have rapidly jumped into action to prepare for the trial—2,160 doses of the trial vaccine and treatments arrived in Uganda’s capital, Kampala, over the weekend.